What'S More Là Gì – Inside The &#39Reply All&#39 Reckoning

Reply All’s four-part series “The Test Kitchen,” on the allegedly toxic and racist workplace culture at Bon Appétit, begins with a simple thesis: that the magazine’s problems were all borne out of one original sin. That sin, as laid out by series host Sruthi Pinnamaneni, was the concentration of power among the same kinds of people — typically white, of the same class, and of the same tastes — at the expense of everyone else.

Đang xem: What's more là gì

In interviews with Pinnamaneni, a longtime Reply All senior staffer, current and former Bon Appétit employees — all of whom were individuals of color — were asked to be vulnerable, and in some cases, to relive hard experiences they had not yet fully processed: entry-level employees and temps who had been made to feel like second-class citizens; more senior staffers of color who felt complicit in supporting a troubling culture. The first two episodes seemed to resonate with a wide swath of listeners (including me). Though the miniseries was about one glossy Condé Nast publication, it served as a window into all manner of other workplaces.

Including, as it turns out, Reply All’s. To Eric Eddings and Brittany Luse, who were Pinnamaneni’s colleagues at the podcast company Gimlet Media from 2015 to 2020, all of this sounded familiar — a little too familiar. “When I found out they were making this series, I laughed,” said Luse. “I was like, ‘You have to be kidding me.’”

Eddings and Luse were the hosts and creators of The Nod, a Gimlet podcast that came to an end last year. Eddings was also active in a union-organizing push that largely took place in late 2018 and early 2019, a period leading up to Gimlet’s acquisition by Spotify. Shortly after the release of the second episode, he took to Twitter. In a long thread, he accused the Reply All team — specifically Pinnamaneni and PJ Vogt, one of the show’s co-founders — of contributing to a “near-identical toxic environment at Gimlet” as described in the Bon Appétit miniseries. “The BA staffers’ stories deserve to be told,” he wrote, “but to me it’s damaging to have that reporting and storytelling come from two people who have actively and AGGRESSIVELY worked against multiple efforts to diversify Gimlet’s staff & content.” He followed that up with a list of accusations: that Reply All held a uniquely influential position at the company, but remained insular. And when it came to the union meant to push for greater equity at the organization, he wrote, Pinnamaneni and Vogt behaved as if their power was being threatened.

Eddings’ thread went viral, promoted by various former Gimlet staffers and numerous peers in the podcast industry. By the end of February, both Vogt and Pinnamaneni would depart from the show permanently. (Neither has left Gimlet altogether; both are currently on leave from the company and declined to comment for this story, though they have issued apologies on Twitter.) The miniseries was abandoned and Reply All — arguably Gimlet’s most critically acclaimed show — was placed on hold.

Xem thêm: Sorry! Something Went Wrong!, The Tao (Intro) By Birdie Pirat On Amazon Music

The scandal at Reply All is just the latest addition to an increasingly long line of companies within the media industry that have been wrestling with accusations of fostering toxic workplaces. (Spotify, which owns Gimlet and Reply All, declined to comment for this story.) It’s also the latest in a wave of various reckonings within the podcast and radio business specifically, which have rocked organizations like the New York Times, KCRW, and WAMU. The story of what happened at Gimlet Media is not unique: In many ways, it’s a classic story about start-up culture. Gimlet, which was purchased by Spotify in February 2019, has been billed as one of podcasting’s biggest success stories, yet its meteoric rise papered over the managerial problems within the company. Soon, one of the industry’s most-coveted companies would erupt in spectacular controversy.

Gimlet was started by Planet Money co-creator Alex Blumberg, who sought to parlay his decorated history and experience as a public-radio producer into a profit-seeking podcast company. He founded the start-up in 2014 — around the time Serial was exploding in popularity, kicking the medium off into the high-flying trajectory it’s on today — and brought the consultant Matt Lieber in as a founding partner. The company was built on a foundation of public-radio talent. Its first talent hires, Reply All’s PJ Vogt and Alex Goldman, joined from New York Public Radio, where they had hosted a small podcast about technology called TLDR. (Pinnamaneni would join the company in March 2015, four months after Reply All’s launch.) Gimlet quickly became the poster child of this new industry, racking up headlines and buzz, up until the company’s blockbuster acquisition by Spotify.

Over the past few weeks, I spoke with ten former Gimlet staffers who described a distinctly informal company, one with the somewhat typical problems that come with working in a start-up environment. (Most of the former staffers whom I spoke to for this story didn’t want to be named, since podcasting is still a small community.) Gimlet was the kind of place, at least in its earlier years, where job titles might be loosely applied and there was little boundary between personal and professional time, with people often working very long hours and deep into weekends. As with start-ups in general, the organizational informality was occasionally exciting to its early employees. But it also led to an environment where there were severe imbalances in power, work, and compensation. Loosely enforced job titles meant that junior workers couldn’t adequately advocate for development in seniority, authority, and pay when they took on more responsibility. A senior producer could pull in a six-figure salary and not seem like they were doing much work, while a junior producer could frequently pull all-nighters and be paid much less — and still have no understanding on how they might formally progress within the organization

It feels like there’s ‘family,’ and then there’s field hands.

There were also pointed concerns about race and diversity in the workplace from the beginning. There were very few Black employees at the company, and the ones who were there had the kind of experiences that made them feel their perspectives were trivialized. Chiquita Pascal, a Black former staffer, wrote in a personal essay about having her security concerns dismissed when she was asked to cover a Klan rally in 2017. (A source familiar with management says there is no HR record of this incident.) Another former staffer, who is also Black, recalled being criticized for refusing to work on a project because it could be perceived as racist.

“It took a while for me to come to a realization that, like, 75 percent of Black employees were described as ‘aggressive’ in formal reports and feedback, and in one-on-ones with managers,” that former staffer told me. “It’s difficult to give feedback on anything to some people in great positions of power at the company without being called aggressive.” (When contacted, a source familiar with Gimlet management disputes this, saying that “the team reviewed the available employee-feedback documents and could not find any use of ‘aggressive’ in a negative or needs-improvement context.”)

Then there was the fact that a meaningful number of Gimlet’s productions leaned on contract workers, who didn’t typically get company benefits. Many of the Black and brown workers at Gimlet were contract workers, not staff members, which meant they automatically had less job security. James T. Green, a former contractor at the company who is Black, recently wrote about his experiences in his own personal essay, where he laid out the way he felt strung along throughout his time as a contract worker. He described his time at the company as leaving him with what he dubbed “Gimlet PTSD,” marked by memories of “unconscious curtailing to white colleagues, and silently holding your tongue in fear of retribution.”

All this is in contrast with the environment described in StartUp, Gimlet’s very first podcast, a meta-show where many of the episodes are dedicated to Blumberg’s self-documentation of his efforts to build the company. Viewed through the lens of the past few weeks, the dissonance of that show is striking: StartUp painted a consistently breezy picture of the office, one that was unnaturally transparent and empathetic. Listening back to the 2015 episode, on the company’s state of diversity, is particularly dissonant with this current discourse; it conceded that, indeed, Gimlet was extremely white, but that diversity also meant a bunch of things beyond race, and that they were working on it.

Xem thêm: bang bo tro nocturne

“For a long time, they were able to utilize this bumbling white-guy persona that’s rampant in radio,” said Brittany Luse. “It’s the persona who answered the door when people showed up asking why there were failures.”

Many of the problems at Gimlet Media — at least through its pre-acquisition years — seemed to be rooted in two related dynamics. The first is the feeling among staffers that power at the company was usually held by and distributed among certain kinds of people with the same tastes in audio. These were usually public-radio veterans: typically people from upper-middle class or wealthy backgrounds who had gone to similar schools, worked at similar jobs, and could afford taking on poorly paid “perma-lance” positions favored by public-radio stations. They were often white, but not always. (Pinnamaneni, who is South Asian, came from the typical audio-professional background.) Some former staffers expressed frustrations at how early senior hires tended to be “grandfathered” in through close informal relationships, creating a sense of a privileged class within the company that could be hard to crack into if you didn’t come from the same contexts. In other words, the same dynamics that were presented at Bon Appétit in the “Test Kitchen.” Some workers who came from different work or educational backgrounds — or who simply had different tastes and perspectives — said they felt like they were only guests in someone else’s home. “It feels like there’s ‘family,’ and then there’s field hands,” said a Black former staffer I spoke to.