It will take a while to download the full MATLAB toolboxes. Try a recent version with your colleagues or students at the faculty.
It's difficult to find a cracked version. Installing a cracked version usually comes with a few viruses. Better to download the original and find a key or a cracked file script to run through the already installed original version.
Ask your administrator in your college, it should be available free for students and with complete toolboxes.
I am a researcher (Silver-Medalist) in faculty of engineering (Electronics). In year 2017, after many struggles, I got a good one version, Matlab 2016a torrent and I use it up-today. But that torrent does not work efficiently, its expired!
To plot quality graphs that can be used for academic and research publication purposes, which software application will you recommend?
How long time should we wait for editor decision on a manuscript? and what to do if we sent a reminder message and did not get a reply for long time?
Some editors keep a paper for long time, more than 6 months or a year, without a decision and when send them a reminder message they do not reply or sometimes reply for the first time saying that the paper still under the review process, then do not reply again for long time. So I ask how a paper takes long time like that for the review process and usually the editors when they invite a reviewer, they ask him to finish the review process within 3 weeks. What the best way to resolve a problem like that, withdraw the paper or just submit to another journal?. The editors in meetings always talk about unethical behavior of authors and never talk about their unethical behavior on authors and during the publication process.
After submitting a revised manuscript (moderate revision was requested), what are the steps followed ?
I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. After 2 months of peer review process, the response was “moderate revision has been requested” and they told me that the new version is required within 1 month.
After making the necessary adjustments, I have resubmitted the revised manuscript back on the 14th of October 2017. On the 21st of October the status changed from “with editor” to “under review”. To date (16th December) the status is “under review”.
In fact, I had made some readings about late reviews, I found that reviews are normally due 14 days after the invitation is accepted by the reviewer.
To avoid any loss of time by submitting manuscripts to inadequate journals, in this websites you can try finding out the best solution.
Xem thêm: Game Of Thrones Season 8
I search for a data center that provides hourly climatic data (temperature, humidity, radiation) for free, from all over the world (terrestrial systems). I am a bit confused as many centers do not provide the same variables (especially radiation) at the same time step (hourly time step is important for me) and with a wide geographic coverage (especially South versus North hemispheres). Thanks for any suggestions!
I have run across some extreme situations in the scientific publishing arena. For example, I had a rejection in 8 hours, an acceptance in 2 days, a rejection in 9 months, and an acceptance in 18 months. These were experiences without resubmit and revise (i.e. first time submission experiences). Would you like to share your ideas?
Dear friends colleagues, have you ever received an invitation to publish your work at InTech Open Science (https://www.intechopen.com/)? I have recently been invited to edit a new book title for them. I am usually suspicious with such invitations and must check the authenticity of the publisher first. Interestingly, they claim that they have published the work for two recent Nobel Laureates. Therefore, I would appreciate your experience and opinions regarding InTech Open Science.
Ejecución paso a paso, y mediante un ejemplo, del algoritmo de Dijkstra utilizando el paquete matemático Matlab. https://polimedia.upv.es/visor/?id=59b1711a-b86b-a244-a474-317c5cea1c27
CARDYNA é um código Matlab que permite efetuar a análise dinâmica de um carro. A dinâmica do carro aqui adoptada segue a formulação apresentada em Flores et al. (2016) ”Sobre o Desempenho do Carro”.